The news that overlaps a little

Three Ballon d’Or winners announced online: Louise asks which one to keep

A few hours before the 70th Ballon d’Or ceremony at the London Palladium on Monday, three articles crowning a different winner each, Harry Kane, Lamine Yamal and Kylian Mbappé, briefly appeared online. According to Walfoot and HLN, two Belgian outlets, such texts are prepared in advance.

Louise, notebook open and pen raised, looks at three identical golden trophies on a newsroom desk, puzzled.

Silly question, but how many Ballons d’Or are there this year? On Monday, a few hours before the ceremony in London, at the London Palladium, three articles briefly appeared online. One for Harry Kane, one for Lamine Yamal, one for Kylian Mbappé. Each of them won. One of the headlines read: “Harry Kane wins the 2026 Ballon d’Or: here are his most spectacular and important goals this year”.

I opened a new tab in my notebook. It’s called “Where?”. Because according to Walfoot, it was on the official Ballon d’Or site, and according to HLN, on the site of France Football, the organiser. So even the location of the mistake has two versions. I wrote down both, at the same height.

Then I understood the system, and I admire it a little. According to Walfoot and HLN, these articles are prepared in advance, so that the right winner can go online the moment the result is announced. So you write every possible winner, and you publish one. It’s like revising every chapter and getting only one in the exam. Except here, all three papers went to the teacher.

According to Walfoot, Kane, Yamal and Mbappé are the only names announced by mistake. So I have another question: were there only three drafts? Or only three that slipped out? I checked, and actually nobody says.

The journalist Romain Molina summed it up: “Either it’s a mistake or it’s bad timing, but in any case, it’s the official site…” I copied the three dots too.

And meanwhile, the ranking was coming out drip by drip all day, according to Walfoot via L’Equipe, co-organiser and sponsor. In the women’s ranking, Belgium’s Tessa Wullaert, one of the thirty nominees, finishes 19th. “At first I couldn’t believe it. I thought: maybe there are a hundred nominees?”, she told HLN. She was recounting too.

Three winners on the same day, Louise. That’s historic. I’m weighing my words.

Nadine · the season-ticket holder, fictional character

In basketball, the MVP is announced once. I looked. Anyway, I still have a lot to learn.

It’s true, we checked: HLN.

Did you enjoy this dispatch?

Get the dispatches by e-mail

The dispatches worth your time, by e-mail. No ads, unsubscribe in one click.

Also the mail from our other titles:

Our columnists’ reactions are fictional; the facts and real quotes are sourced above.

The other angles in French

The editor-in-chief chose this one: « Seul B transpose le mécanisme exact du fait (des versions préparées à l'avance, toutes affichées en même temps) en une scène de vestiaire qui déraille, ce qui donne une vraie chute. Les trois autres sont propres mais n'ont pas de moment qui fait rire franchement. »

NadineThe Season-Ticket Holder

Kane, Yamal et Mbappé sacrés en ligne avant l’heure : Nadine fête les trois

Trois articles annonçant Harry Kane, Lamine Yamal et Kylian Mbappé vainqueurs du Ballon d'Or 2026 sont brièvement apparus en ligne lundi, avant la cérémonie de Londres. Dans le classement féminin, la Belge Tessa Wullaert termine 19e.

  • Funniness 3/5
  • Faithfulness 4/5
  • Voice 4/5
  • Retweet 4/5
  • Good nature 5/5

The editor-in-chief’s comment Les tics de Nadine sont bien placés et la question de Louise (« on rend les trois ? ») fonctionne, mais le canapé et le beau-frère dispersent la dépêche.

Read this angle →

MarcelThe Nostalgic

Trois lauréats du Ballon d’Or en ligne avant l’heure : Marcel attend son hebdo

Avant la 70e cérémonie du Ballon d'Or, lundi à Londres, trois articles annonçant Harry Kane, Lamine Yamal et Kylian Mbappé vainqueurs ont brièvement été publiés. Selon Walfoot, sur le site officiel du trophée ; selon HLN, sur celui de France Football.

  • Funniness 3/5
  • Faithfulness 4/5
  • Voice 4/5
  • Retweet 4/5
  • Good nature 5/5

The editor-in-chief’s comment Le deadpan sur le titre « très long pour une chose qui n'était pas arrivée » et sur les trois points de Molina est bon, mais l'hebdomadaire de Marcel reste une comparaison attendue.

Read this angle →