The news that overlaps a little

Gordon insists control isn’t ‘English DNA’, Louise hunts for the test

Anthony Gordon has said that controlling matches is not in the English DNA, and that England could win major tournaments by leaning into the country’s own strengths instead of copying Spain. He was speaking at St George’s Park before Saturday’s game against Spain, England’s first gathering since the World Cup.

Louise checks her glossary notebook beside a stats board showing Spain's possession, puzzled by a proud English player.

Anthony Gordon said, at St George’s Park, that controlling a match “is not in the English DNA.” The forward, who joined Barcelona from Newcastle this summer for £69.3m, was speaking before Saturday’s game against Spain, England’s first gathering since the World Cup.

He added: “We can’t keep looking at other countries and trying to be like them, because we’re not them – we’re English and we have our own strengths which they don’t have, so maybe we start playing the way we’re good at,” he told the BBC. He also described the semi-final defeat as a scar that “doesn’t have to be a negative one because it might lead us to victory in the next tournaments.”

Louise got her notebook out. She checked “DNA” first in the glossary she’s kept since her first day covering football. Nothing there. So she asked three different people what exactly was in this English DNA, besides not controlling the ball.

I was told “courage”, “long balls” and “the rain”. None of the three answers is a chromosome. I checked, and actually nobody knows what’s really in there. Anyway, I still have a lot to learn.

Louise · the intern, fictional character

Silly question, but if English DNA means not controlling the ball, how come Gordon himself, a starter in five matches during the tournament with four assists, put England ahead against Argentina before being substituted seventeen minutes later? Manager Thomas Tuchel then switched to a back five, a decision criticised ever since. Enzo Fernandez equalised, then Lautaro Martinez won it for Argentina in stoppage time. England then beat France 6-4 for third place, their best World Cup result since 1966.

Spain, for their part, were crowned champions after dominating Argentina with 65% possession, limiting Lionel Messi’s side to two shots off target in 120 minutes. Louise wrote in the margin: “Controlling the ball actually seems to work.” She also added that England have lost two consecutive European Championship finals and were knocked out by France, then Argentina, in the last two World Cups, which, in her view, might deserve a second chromosome to look for.

It’s true, we checked: BBC Sport.

Did you enjoy this dispatch?

Get the dispatches by e-mail

The dispatches worth your time, by e-mail. No ads, unsubscribe in one click.

Also the mail from our other titles:

Our columnists’ reactions are fictional; the facts and real quotes are sourced above.

The other angle in French

The editor-in-chief chose this one: « Seule Louise tient une vraie chute, incarnée et sans verdict sur le joueur, que Gordon pourrait partager. Les autres se heurtent à la fidélité ou à un jugement implicite sur une défaite encore fraîche. »

NadineThe Season-Ticket Holder

3e place mondiale, meilleure depuis 1966 : Nadine importe son thermomètre

L'Angleterre a perdu sa demi-finale de Coupe du monde 2-1 contre l'Argentine, avant de battre la France 6-4 dans le match pour la troisième place. C'est son meilleur résultat en Coupe du monde depuis 1966, malgré deux finales d'Euro perdues d'affilée et des éliminations par la France puis l'Argentine lors des deux dernières Coupes du monde.

  • Funniness 2/5
  • Faithfulness 4/5
  • Voice 3/5
  • Retweet 2/5
  • Good nature 3/5

The editor-in-chief’s comment Le clin d'œil à 2018 est bien trouvé, mais « c'est une honte » sur une demi-finale perdue ne se partage pas en riant, et le titre ne dit rien.

Read this angle →