The news that overlaps a little

Nainggolan calls on Botticelli over Drammeh’s penalty, VAR was missing a painter

After Standard’s 0-1 defeat to Charleroi, with no penalty for a trodden foot on Salieu Drammeh, Radja Nainggolan summed up his astonishment with a line about Botticelli. Stijn Stijnen wants more former players on VAR, which Olivier Deschacht finds problematic.

Marcel stands with hands behind his back at a VAR monitor showing two boots overlapping, beside an empty easel with a paintbrush.

Standard lost 0-1 to Charleroi. In the box, Salieu Drammeh had his foot trodden on. No penalty. VAR asked for nothing.

Radja Nainggolan summed up his astonishment, in Dutch: “Even Botticelli can see this, you know.” Botticelli. A painter from Florence. Dead for more than five centuries. I note that he is now cited to tell a foot from a stud. In 1980, we cited the referee. I’m not criticising. I’m noting that the standard of reference has gone up.

Jonathan Lardot, head of the Belgian referees, judged afterwards that Standard should have had that penalty. The contact was clear enough to intervene, he said. So there were three people in front of a screen during the match, and the right answer arrived afterwards. A weekly paper does the same. It costs less.

Stijn Stijnen would like more former footballers on VAR. Olivier Deschacht sees a problem, because of their past at Anderlecht or Club Brugge. Let me sum up. We invented a machine so as to stop depending on one man. And now we look for which men to put in the machine. Note that I’m not against progress. I’m against this progress.

Deschacht also demands the suspension of the three officials involved. Three suspensions for one foot. At the Heysel, we had one referee, two linesmen, and when it was missed, it was missed for everyone at the same time. We went home. We talked about it at the chip shop. Nobody asked a painter for his opinion.

Me, I’d put Botticelli on the right wing. When we’ve got eleven, that is.

Freddy · the gaffer, fictional character

I’ll reread all of this on Monday, in my paper. The score will still be 0-1. Well. It’s the times.

It’s true, we checked: Voetbalkrant.

Did you enjoy this dispatch?

Get the dispatches by e-mail

The dispatches worth your time, by e-mail. No ads, unsubscribe in one click.

Also the mail from our other titles:

Our columnists’ reactions are fictional; the facts and real quotes are sourced above.

The other angle in French

The editor-in-chief chose this one: « La dépêche de Louise fait rire du seul dispositif, avec une logique de comptage qui tient du début à la fin et une chute Botticelli candide. Marcel est aussi drôle mais cumule les ajouts au noyau et une référence au Heysel qu'on ne veut pas voir en décor de nostalgie. »

FreddyThe Gaffer

Deschacht invoque un arbitre de quatrième provinciale, la P3 se sent enfin consultée

Battu 0-1 par Charleroi dans le choc wallon, le Standard n'a pas obtenu de penalty pour un pied écrasé de Salieu Drammeh dans la surface. Dans le podcast Ongefilterd, Olivier Deschacht réclame la suspension des trois arbitres impliqués ; Jonathan Lardot, responsable des arbitres belges, a jugé après coup qu'il y avait penalty.

  • Funniness 3/5
  • Faithfulness 3/5
  • Voice 4/5
  • Retweet 4/5
  • Good nature 4/5

The editor-in-chief’s comment La P4 comme unité de mesure est une bonne idée de Freddy, mais il la revendique comme « notre étage » alors qu'il entraîne en P3, et « ancien d'Anderlecht » n'est pas dans le noyau ; le corps s'éparpille ensuite.

Read this angle →